Pages

Sunday 30 August 2015

6 STUBBORN RED PLANET CONSPIRACY THEORIES


wpsDE7B.tmp
Mars Hoaxes! 6 Stubborn Red Planet Conspiracy Theories
By Elizabeth Howell,
Live Science, 27 August 2015.

Every year in August, the same Mars message circulates across the Internet: The Red Planet will appear "as big as the full moon" in the sky, as seen with the naked eye. The problem is, it's not true: Skywatchers won't be able to see a "double moon" in the late August sky.

The so-called Mars Hoax (which started in 2003 after a real-life close approach of Mars to the Earth) is just one of a series of false claims concerning the Red Planet.

Here are some misconceptions about Mars that just won't die. [Seeing Things On Mars: A History of Martian Illusions]

1. Mars as big as the full moon

wpsABE7.tmp

The culprit for this hoax was an unsigned email advising people how to observe Mars during the planet's historically close approach to Earth in August 2003, said Space.com skywatching columnist Joe Rao. Readers apparently missed the line saying that it would take a 75-power magnification in a telescope to make Mars appear as big as the full moon.

2. "Face" on Mars

wps416E.tmp
Credit: NASA

This hoax arose from a picture taken in 1976 [shown above] by NASA's Viking 1 orbital spacecraft of a rocky outcrop in the Cydonia region of Mars. The appearance of what looks like a face (created by light and shadows) sparked discussions that it could have been some remnant of an ancient civilization. The "face on Mars" idea persisted even past 1998, when NASA and the European Space Agency began taking more pictures with higher-resolution cameras to show that the face-like shape on the planet's surface was a coincidence.

3. Woman on Mars

wpsEEFC.tmp
Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Cornell University via Space.com

In 2007, NASA's Spirit rover captured a photo of what appeared to be a human figure (perhaps a woman) far in the distance. The mysterious photo lit up several Internet forums as users had hopes of confirming life on another planet. But astronomers quickly pointed out that the human shape is actually just a rock that is only a few inches high, but positioned very close to the camera. Plus, humans can't breathe on Mars. [Why Do We Believe in Mars Hoaxes?]

4. Iguana on Mars

wps74FB.tmp
Credit: NASA

In 2013, conspiracy sites reported a "creature" spotted in a photo captured by the Curiosity rover: an iguana. But as The Huffington Post pointed out at the time, the iguana, rat and other animals spotted in photos from the Red Planet have yet to be shown to be anything but oddly shaped rocks.

5. Rat on Mars?

wps1D3D.tmp
Image via Discovery News. Original image (left): NASA/JPL-Caltech.

UFO buffs zeroed in on a portion of a panoramic photo taken by NASA's Curiosity rover in September 2012. These viewers spotted an object that looked like a rat lying between two rocks. While it's a creative idea, the "Mars rat" is unlikely, scientists have said. The Red Planet has extremely cold temperatures, is baked in radiation and lacks a thick, protective atmosphere like Earth's, making it an extremely hostile environment for life.

6. Life-bearing organics on Mars

wpsFE05.tmp

Based on a vague quote from the Curiosity rover's chief scientist, rumours swirled in late 2012 that Curiosity found complex organic compounds (organics contain carbon, which can be a building block of life). But it turned out that the rover's organic findings were not complex organic compounds, and it was unclear to scientists if the carbon in them had originated on Earth and were brought to the Red Planet, or if they were truly Martian. Interestingly enough, proof of more-complex forms of organics [pictured above] were in fact found, in 2014.

Top image: The image that accompanied the "Mars Spectacular" email of 2003, which sparked the recurring Mars Hoax. Credit: Origin Unknown via Space.com.

[Source: Live Science. Edited. Some images added.]

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please adhere to proper blog etiquette when posting your comments. This blog owner will exercise his absolution discretion in allowing or rejecting any comments that are deemed seditious, defamatory, libelous, racist, vulgar, insulting, and other remarks that exhibit similar characteristics. If you insist on using anonymous comments, please write your name or other IDs at the end of your message.